Theoretical Concepts for Describing a Replication-levels-based Uncertainty Analysis Approach

  1. Zarketa-Astigarraga, Ander
  2. Martin-Mayor, Alain
  3. Martinez Agirre, Manex
Buch:
Advances in Measurements and Instrumentation: Review Book Series

Verlag: International Frequency Sensor Association IFSA

ISBN: 978-84-09-29267-7 978-84-09-29266-0

Datum der Publikation: 2021

Art: Buch-Kapitel

Zusammenfassung

Delimiting the scope of uncertainty analysis, which places itself between the fields of mathematics and physical experimentalism, may turn tedious for the newbie who tries to take it to application for the first time. However, performing such an analysis is becoming an accepted standard on fields including any sort of experiment, and the subsequent results are being required to provide information on their degree of exactitude. This calls for a systematization when accounting for the uncertainties of measured magnitudes, and systematizing such an analysis, albeit possible and desirable, asks for a well-founded background on the notions that underpin the uncertainty theory. The fact, anyway, is that there seems to be no conclusive consensus regarding the basic concepts that are meant to constitute the building blocks of the theory; rather, those concepts are to be found on a number of canonical references [1,3, 5, 7, 8] that, although compose a closed system of notions as a theory already liable to be applied, lack of a unified narrative necessary for constituting a holistic view of the subject.

Informationen zur Finanzierung

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Department of Education of the Basque Government for the Research Grant [PRE_2017_1_0178].

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • [1]. R. B. Abernethy, R. P. Benedict, R. B. Dowdell, ASME measurement uncertainty, J. Fluids Eng., Vol. 107, 1985, pp. 161-164.
  • [2]. J. B. Johnson, Thermal agitation of electricity in conductors, Phys. Rev., Vol. 32, 1928, pp. 97-109.
  • [3]. J. S. Kline, F. A. McClintock, Uncertainties in single-sample experiments, Mech. Eng. , 1953, pp. 3-8.
  • [4]. Y. Mishin, Thermodynamic theory of equilibrium fluctuations, Annals of Physics, Vol. 363, 2015, pp. 48-97.
  • [5]. R. J. Moffat, The measurement chain and validation of experimental measurements, in Proceedings of the 6th Congress of the International Measurement Confederation (ACTA IMEKO’73), Vol. 1, Dresden, Germany, 1973, pp. 45-53.
  • [6]. R. J. Moffat, Contributions to the theory of single-sample uncertainty analysis, J. Fluids Eng., Vol. 104, 1982, pp. 250-258.
  • [7]. R. J. Moffat, Using uncertainty analysis in the planning of an experiment, J. Fluids Eng., Vol. 107, 1985, pp. 173-178.
  • [8]. R. J. Moffat, Describing the uncertainties in experimental results, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., Vol. 1, 1988, pp. 3-17.
  • [9]. J. Olarrea Busto, M. Cordero Gracia, Estadística, 45 Problemas Útiles, 1st Edition, Garcia Maroto Editores, Madrid, 2009.
  • [10]. K. Pearson, On the mathematical theory of errors of judgment, with special reference to the personal equation, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, Vol. 198, 1902, pp. 235-299.
  • [11]. B. L. Welch, The generalization of student’s problem when several different population variances are involved, Biometrika, Vol. 34, 1947, pp. 28-35.
  • [12]. T. Arts, J.-M. Buchlin, Temperature measurements, Chapter 4, in Measurement Techniques in Fluid Dynamics, 3rd Edition, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Brussels, 2009.