Empirical Measurement Instruments for Business Model Innovationa Review

  1. Dorleta Ibarra 1
  2. Jaione Ganzarain 1
  3. Juan Ignacio Igartua 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Mondragón/Mondragon Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad de Mondragón/Mondragon Unibertsitatea

    Mondragón, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00wvqgd19

Libro:
Advances in engineering networks: proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management
  1. Castro, Rodolfo de (ed. lit.)
  2. Gerusa Giménez (ed. lit.)

Editorial: Springer Suiza

ISBN: 978-3-030-44529-4 978-3-030-44530-0

Ano de publicación: 2020

Páxinas: 19-28

Congreso: International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management (12. 2018. Girona)

Tipo: Achega congreso

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-44530-0_3 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable

Resumo

Recent studies have highlighted the significant impact that businessmodel innovation (BMI) has on business strategy, performance, and competitive advantage. However, the literature is still quite fragmented; there is no commonly accepted definition of the term, and progress toward solid theoretical constructs is still under development. Thus, the need to identify empirical measurement instruments that enable the definition and measurement of BMI has been identified. The present paper conducts a systematic literature review, selecting four empirically validated BMI measurement scales for analysis.After comparing them, itwas concluded that the four measurement instruments are helpful tools for managers to assess business models (BM), benchmark the competition or plan a strategy. In addition, the instruments contribute to a better understanding of BM and BMI, and establish the basis for further research in the field. Some limitations were found, however, namely, that the instruments are not generalizable to study a particular phenomenon and their reliability could be affected when applying them in a different context to the original study. Finally, some items used in the scales were found to be open to multiple interpretations and thus care must be taken to ensure alignment with the research question.