Elkarrizketak irakasleen prestakuntzarako bitartekoirakasle-bideratzaileen jarduna ezaugarritzen

  1. Garro, Eneritz
  2. Ipiña, Nagore
  3. Ozaeta, Arantza
Revista:
Tantak: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko hezkuntza aldizkaria

ISSN: 0214-9753

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 30

Número: 2

Páginas: 99-116

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Tantak: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko hezkuntza aldizkaria

Resumen

The aim of the present paper is to analyse and characterise the way in which teacher educators work with student teachers when conducting analyses of their own practice by means of selfconfrontation interviews. The corpus of this work consists of 10 self-confrontation interviews carried out by 5 teacher educators. The role of those teacher educators was analysed using the transcriptions of the interviews and 9 categories were identified. Two categories were found to be the most common: demanding specifications and creating controversy. Differences were also found as regards teacher educators’ profile. As a result, in-depth training for teacher educators has been considered as needed. initial teacher education, teacher educators, analysis of the activity, self-confrontation interviews.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alsina, A. (2013). Un modelo realista para el desarrollo profesional en la formación inicial de maestros de educación infantil. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación delProfesorado, 16(2), 27-37. Hemen: http://dx.doi. org/10.6018/reifop.16.2.180761
  • Alonso, I., Azpeitia, A. Iriondo, I. & Zulaika, T. (2017). Autoconfrontación a la propia actividad de enseñanza. Formación e investigación de la formación. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 20(2),169-182.
  • Azpeitia, A., Alonso, I. & Garro, E. (2013). Profesionalizazio-bidea eraikitzen. Irakasle hasiberri baten autokonfrontazio-elkarrizketaren azterketa. Ikastaria, 19, 171-196.
  • Beauchamp, C. (2015). Reflection in teacher education: issues emerging from a review of current literature, Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 16:1, 123-141.
  • Bikuña, A., Sagasta, P. & Ipiña, N. (2017). Teacher educators confronting their own practice: promoting an inquiry stance in English student teachers. European Teacher Education Network Anual Conference, «Building bridges», Gothenburg, Apirilak 20-22 .
  • Bogdan, R.C. & Biklen, S.K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed). Boston, MA:Allyn and Bakon.
  • Borer, L. & Muller, A. (2016) L’enquete collaborative comme démarche de transformation de l’activité d’enseignement de la formation initiale o la formation continuée. Apprendre à enseigner, 193-207.
  • Bronckart, J.P, Bulea, E., Fillietaz, L., Fristalon, I., Plazaola Giger, I. & Revaz, F. (2004). Agir et discours en situation de travail. Cahiers de la section des sciences de l’éducation, 103.
  • Burrows, J. (2008) Trainee Perceptions of observation. Huddersfield: Huddersfield Consortium.
  • Clot, Y. (1999). La fonction psychologique du travail. PUF: Paris.
  • Clot, Y. & Faïta, D. (2000). Genres et styles en analyse du travail. Concepts et méthodes. Travailler, 4, 7-42.
  • Dewey, J. (1993). How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: D.C.Heath.
  • Dolz, J. & Leutenegger, F. (2015). L’analyse des pratiques: une démarche fondamentale dans la formation des enseignants?. Formation et pratiques d’enseignement en questions, 18, 7-16.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Durand, M. (2008). Un programme de recherche technologique en formation des adultes. Education & Didactique, 2, 69-93.
  • Friedrich, J. (2001). La discussion du langage intérieur par L.S. Vygotskij, Langue Française, 57-71.
  • Gaudin, C. & Chaliès, S. (2012). L’utilisation de la vidéo dans la formation professionnelle des enseignants novices : revue de littérature et zones potentielles d’étude. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 178, 115-130
  • Gaudin, C. & Flandin, S. (2014). La vidéoformation dans tous ses états : Quelles options théoriques ? Quels scénarios ? Pour quels effets ? Chaire UNESCO «Former les enseignants au xxie siècle» Conférence de consensus —2014-01-23—.
  • Gelfuso, A. & Dennis, D.V. (2014). Getting reflection off the page: The challenges of developing support structures for pre-service teacher reflection. Teaching and Teacher Educaction, 38, 1-11.
  • Grant, C. & Zeichner, K. (1984). On becoming a reflective teacher. Hemen: C.Grant (ed). Preparing for reflective teaching. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Hatton, N. & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 33-49.
  • Ipiña, N., Bikuña, A. & Sagasta, P. (2018). Analysing the role of the facilitator in video playback in teacher education, European Teacher Education Network Anual Conference, «Diversity as a resource», Rotterdam, Martxoak 22-24.
  • Korthagen, F.A.J., Kessels, J., Koster, B., Lagerwerf, B. & Wubbels, T. (2001).Linking practice and theory. N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Mauri, T., Clará, M., Colomina, R. & Onrubia, J. (2017). Patterns of interaction in the processes of joint reflection by student teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43 (4), 427-443.
  • Newby, P. (2010). Research methods for education, Harlow: Pearson Education Research.
  • Ozaeta, A. (2013) Hizkuntza irakasleen prestakuntzarako eta prestakuntzaren ikerketarako proposamen bat, Ikastaria, 19, 69-95.
  • Peake, G. (2006). Observation of the Practice of Teaching. Huddersfield: Huddersfield Consortium.
  • Perez Gómez, A. (2010). Nuevas exigencias y escenarios para la profesión docente en la era de la información y de la incertidumbre. REIFOP, 64, 17-36.
  • Plazaola Giger, I. & Ozaeta Elorza, A. (2014). Les formes de la parole dans l’entretien formatif d’auto-confrontation. Activités, 11(2), 112-128. http:// www.activites.org/v11n2
  • Plazaola, I.; Elosegi, K.; Ruiz Bikandi, U.; Arregi, A. & Badiola, N. (2013). Irakasle hasiberriaren esperientzia. Ikastaria, 19, 139-169.
  • Plazaola, I. & HIPRESTeko taldekideak (2015). Análisis de las actividades típicas de la enseñanza de las lenguas. Un proyecto científico de conocimiento y de formación del profesorado. Presentado en VII Seminario Investigación en el aula. Mondragon Unibertsitatea. Urtarrilak 22.
  • Pozo, M.T. & García, B. (2006). El portafolio del alumnado. Una investigaciónacción en el aula universitaria. Revista de Educación, 341, 737-756.
  • Ria, L., Serres, G. & Leblanc, S. (2009). De l’observation vidéo a l’observation in situ de trabail enseignant en milieu difficile: étude des effets sur des professeurs stagiaires. Revue Suisse des sciences de l’éducation, 31 (3), 105-120.
  • Russell, T. (2005). Can reflective practice be taught? Reflective practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspective, 6(2), 199-204.
  • Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practicioner. Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • Tardif, M., Borges, C. & Malo, A. (2012). Le virage réflexif en éducation: ou en sommes-nous 30 ans aprè Schö ? Bruxelles, Belgique : De Boeck.
  • Thereau, J. (1992). Le cours d’action: analyse sémio-logique: essai d’une anthropologie cognitive située. Editions Peter Lang: Berna.
  • Theureau, J. & Jeffroy, F. (1994). Ergonomie des situations informatisées, Toulouse, Octares.
  • Tripp, T. & Rich, P. (2012). Using video to analyze one’s own teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43 (4), 678-704.
  • van Es, E.A., Tunney, J., Goldsmith, L.T. & Seago, N. (2014). A framework for ournal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 340-356.
  • Ward, J.R. & McCotter, S.S. (2004). Reflection as a visible outcome for preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 243-257
  • Zabalza, M.A. (2004). Diarios de clase. Un instrumento de investigación y desarrollo profesional. Madrid: Narcea
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet