IM2, a Maturity Model for Innovation in SMEs

  1. Juan Ignacio Igartua 1
  2. Javier Retegi 1
  3. Jaione Ganzarain 1
  1. 1 Mechanical and Industrial Production Department Mondragon University. Spain
Revista:
Dirección y organización: Revista de dirección, organización y administración de empresas

ISSN: 1132-175X

Año de publicación: 2018

Número: 64

Páginas: 42-49

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.37610/DYO.V0I64.521 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Dirección y organización: Revista de dirección, organización y administración de empresas

Resumen

With the aim to discover and assess specific aspects of management and evaluate their ‘maturity level’, both practitioners and academics have developed a wide range of maturity assessment models over the last decades. In spite of its broad proliferation, their focus is very functional based and specialized, with a detailed approach that only suits big organizations and not small enterprises. On the other hand there is a need for small SMEs to develop practical approaches towards innovation, with clear and defined directions to develop structured innovation processes based on and integrated innovation management approach. Thus, this paper presents a tool to quickly assess the maturity of a firm’s innovation approach. A literature review on maturity models was carried out to in order to build the structure of the Innovation Maturity Model tool (IM2), whereas the content of the tool is also based on a literature review on best practices in SMEs management and innovation. Application of maturity models to Innovation in SMEs is a first-step to focus innovation management in the strategically right areas, and will help organizations to integrate this methodology into their culture, fostering an organizational learning approach. The tool presented in this paper illustrates an agile way to assess the maturity of a firm’s innovation approach and a practical a first-step to focus innovation management in the strategically right areas, and to establish action plans in order to advance in the achievement of stablished objectives, fostering an organizational learning approach. The proposed IM2 maturity model has been applied in a specific region in Basque Country were small SMES, Local Development Agencies and the University through an action research project. Specifically, the pilot project was carried out using the practical application of IM2 scheme. About the elements to be considered, the review of the literature has helped to identify different maturity models that could be considered in an integrated manner when developing this Innovation Maturity Model (IM2) approach for small SMEs. Thus, when building IM2 two main questions need to be answered, one related to the objects classification and another about the maturity scale to be used. Therefore some best practices were considered from the existing literature. Hence eleven categories were considered: Strategy, Competitiveness, Manufacturing Excellence, Innovation, Value propositions and business model, Internationalization, Advanced Management, Digitalization, Sustainability, People, and Territory. We consider that this experience shows a practical method to foster innovation in small SMEs through the mastering of innovation management, the implementation of key factors and the promotion of a learning experience through a "step-by-step recipes". The assumption that organizational change and evolution occur in predictable patterns in SMEs is partially confirmed, although opportunity (as an appropriate or favourable time or occasion) is a key factor in SMEs approach towards innovation. Finally, we consider that further action research should be done in order to improve and adjust the factors, the levels, and levers. In addition, we consider that the relationship between the implementation of IM2 and innovation performance of participating companies could be a future research topic.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

We would like to thank the Regional Government of Gipuzkoa (GFA) for their support in the development of ETEBHI project, as well as to all participating companies.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • BECKER, J., KNACKSTEDT, R. & PÖPPELBUß, J. 2009. Developing maturity models for IT management - A procedure model and its application. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1, 213-222.
  • BROOKES, N., BUTLER, M., DEY, P. & CLARK, R. 2014. The use of maturity models in improving project management performance: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 7, 231-246.
  • DE BRUIN, T., ROSEMANN, M., FREEZE, R. & KULKARNI, U. 2005. Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model.
  • ESSMANN, H. & DU PREEZ, N. 2010. An Innovation Capability Maturity Model - development and initial application. International Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 44-45.
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION 2015. Small Business Act - Spain. European Commission.
  • KHAN, A. 2016. Innovationsmanagement in der Energiewirtschaft Springer Gabler.
  • KHATIBIAN, N., HASAN, T. & JAFARI, H. A. 2010. Measurement of knowledge management maturity level within organizations. Business Strategy Series, 11, 54-70.
  • KLIMKO, G. 2001. Knowledge management and maturity models: Building common understanding. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Knowledge Management, 269-278.
  • KOHLEGGER, M., MAIER, R. & THALMANN, S. Understanding maturity models results of a structured content analysis. 9th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies, I-KNOW 2009 and 5th International Conference on Semantic Systems, I-SEMANTICS 2009, 2009a Graz. 51-61.
  • KOHLEGGER, M., MAIER, R. & THALMANN, S. Understanding maturity models results of a structured content analysis. Proceedings of I-KNOW 2009 -9th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies and Proceedings of I-SEMANTICS 2009 - 5th International Conference on Semantic Systems, 2009b. 51-61.
  • MCDERMOTT, C. M. & PRAJOGO, D. I. 2012. Service innovation and performance in SMEs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32, 216-237.
  • METTLER, T. 2011. Maturity assessment models: a design science research approach. International Journal of Society Systems Science, 3, 81-98.
  • METTLER, T. & ROHNER, P. 2009. Situational maturity models as instrumental artifacts for organizational design. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology
  • PÖPPELBUß, J. & RÖGLINGER, M. 2011. What makes a useful maturity model? A framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management.
  • RANDEREE, K., MAHAL, A. & NARWANI, A. 2012. A business continuity management maturity model for the UAE banking sector. Business Process Management Journal, 18, 472-492.
  • RÖGLINGER, M., PÖPPELBUß, J. & BECKER, J. 2012. Maturity models in business process management. Business Process Management Journal, 18, 328-346.
  • SOLLI-SÆTHER, H. & GOTTSCHALK, P. 2010. The modeling process for stage models. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 20, 279-293.
  • WENDLER, R. 2012. The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 54, 1317-1339.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet