Gobernar el conocimiento

Referencias bibliográficas

• Beck, U.; Giddens, A. y Lash, S. (1994): Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Cambridge, Polity.
• Berkhout, F.; Leach, M. y Scoones, I. (2004): Negotiating Environmental Change: New Perspectives from Social Science, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
• Chavas, J.P. (2004): Risk Analysis in Theory and Practice, London, Elsevier Academic Press.
• Cooke, R.M. (1982): "Risk Assessment and Rational Decision Theory", Dialectica, Vol. 36, Nº 4, pp. 329-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1982.tb01547.x
• Covello, V.T.; Menkes, J. y Mumpower, J. (1986): Risk Evaluation and Management, New York, Plenum Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2103-3
• Echeverria, J. (2002): Ciencia y valores, Madrid, Destino. PMCid:PMC1740278
• Echeverria, J. (2003): La revolución tecnocientífica, Mexico, FCE.
• Eizagirre, A. (2009): "Las nuevas iniciativas europeas sobre ciencia y sociedad", Sistema, Nº 210, pp. 3-22.
• Eizagirre, A. (2011): "La precaución como principio de acción sostenible", Isegoria, Nº 44, pp. 303-324.
• Funtowicz, S. y Ravetz, J.R. (1999): "Post-Normal Science: An Insight Now Maturing", Futures, Vol. 31, Nº 7, pp. 641-646.
• Garvin, T. (2001): "Analytical Paradigms: The Epistemological Distances Between Scientists, Policy Makers, and the Public", Risk Analysis, Vol. 21, Nº 3, pp. 443-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.213124 PMid:11572425
• Giddens, A. (1990): The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity. PMCid:PMC53469
• Graham, J.D y Rhomberg, L. (1996): "How Risks Are Identified and Assessed", ANNALS, Nº 545, pp. 15-24.
• Grundmann, R. y Stehr, N. (2003): "Social Control and Knowledge in Democratic Societies", Science and Public Policy, Vol. 30, Nº 3, pp. 183-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780524
• Hansson, S.O. (1996): "Decision Making under Great Uncertainty", Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 26, Nº 3, pp. 369-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004839319602600304
• Heimann, C.F.L. (1997): Acceptable Risks, Ann Arbor, Michigan University Press.
• Irwin, A. (2006): "The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the `New´ Scientific Governance", Social Studies of Science, Vol. 36, Nº 2, pp. 299-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306312706053350
• Irwin, A.; Rothstein, H.; Yearley, S. y McCarthy, E. (1997): "Regulatory Science: Towards a Sociological Framework", Futures, Vol. 29, Nº 1, pp. 17-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(96)00063-8
• Jaeger, C.C.; Renn, O.; Rosa, E.A. y Webler, T. (2001): Risk, Uncertainty and Rational Action, London, Earthscan.
• Jasanoff, S. (1990): The Fifth Branch: Scientific Advisors as Policymakers, Cambridge, Harvard University Press. PMid:17811855
• Jasanoff, S. (1993): "Bridging the Two Cultures of Risk Analysis", Risk Analysis, Vol. 13, Nº 2, pp. 123-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01057.x
• Jasanoff, S. (2005): Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press.
• Jasanoff, S. (ed.) (2004): States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, London, Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203413845
• Krimsky, S. y Goulding, D. (eds.) (1992): Social Theories of Risk, Westport, Praeger. PMid:1574615
• Latour, B. (1998): "From the World of Science to the World of Research?", Science, Vol. 280, Nº 5361, pp. 208-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5361.208
• Lave, L.B. (ed.) (1987): Risk Assessment and Management, New York, Plenum Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6443-7 PMCid:PMC1646833
• Leach, M.; Scoones, I. y Wynne, B. (eds.) (2005): Science and Citizens. Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, London, Zed Books.
• Lentchs, J. y Weingart, P. (eds.) (2011): The Politics of Scientific Advice, Institutional Design for Quality Assurance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Leshner, A.I. (2004): "Where Science Meets Society",Science, Vol. 307, Nº 5711, p. 815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1110260 PMid:15705810
• López Cerezo, J.A. y Lujan, J.L. (2000): Ciencia y política del riesgo, Madrid, Alianza.
• MacMillan, T. (2004): Engaging in Innovation: Towards an Integrated Science Policy, London, IPPR.
• Maasen, S. y Weingart, P. (eds.) (2005): Democratization of Expertise? Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, Dordrecht, Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3754-6 PMid:16289462
• McDaniels, T. y Small, M. (eds.) (2004): Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. PMid:15112789
• Molak, V. (ed.) (1997): Fundamentals of Risk Analysis and Risk Management, New York, Lewis.
• Nowotny, H.; Scott, P. y Gibbons, M. (2001): Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge, Polity. PMCid:PMC96016
• Perrow, Ch. (1999): Normal Accidents, New York, Basic Books.
• Radder, H. (1986): "Experiment, Technology and the Intrinsic Connection Between Knowledge and Power", Social Studies of Science, Vol. 16, Nº 4, pp. 663-683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631286016004005
• Renn, O. (1992): "Concepts of Risk: A Classification", in Krismky, S. y Goulding, D. (eds.) (1992), Social Theories of Risk, pp. 53-79. Westport, Praeger.
• Renn, O. (2008): Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World, Oxford, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
• Roqueplo, P. (1995): "Scientific Expertise Among Political Powers, Administrations and Public Opinion", Science and Public Policy, Vol. 22, Nº. 3, pp. 175-182.
• Rothstein, H.; Irwin, A.; Yearley, S. y McCarthy, E. (1999): "Regulatory Science. Europeanisation and the Control of Agrochemical", Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol. 24, Nº 2, pp. 241-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224399902400203
• Rowe, G. y Wright, G. (2001): "Differences in Expert and Lay Judgements of Risk: Myth or Reality?", Risk Analysis, Vol. 21, Nº.2, pp. 341-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.212116 PMid:11414542
• Rowe, W.D. (1992): "Risk Analysis: A Tool for Policy Decisions", in Waterstone, M. (ed.), Risk and Society: The Interaction of Science, Technology and Public Policy, pp. 17-31, Dordrecht, Kluwer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3634-1_2
• Shackley, S. y Wynne, B. (1996): "Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority", Science, Technology and Human Values, Vol. 21, Nº. 3, pp. 275-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100302
• Shrader-Frechette, K. (1991): Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms, Berkeley, University of California Press. PMid:1777021
• Stehr, N. (2000): "Policing Knowledge", in Maasen, S. y Winterhager, M. (eds.), Science Studies: Probing the Dynamics of Scientific Knowledge, pp. 259-290, Munich, Transcript Verlag.
• Stehr, N. (ed.) (2005): Knowledge Politics. Governing the Consequences of Science and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, Paradigm Publishers. PMCid:PMC1214679
• Wilsdon, J. y Willis, R. (2004): Seethrough Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream, London, Demos. PMid:15830447
• Wynne, B. (1982): "Institutional Mythologies and Dual Societies in the Management of Risk", in Kunreuther, H. y Ley, E. (eds.) (1982), The Risk Analysis Controversy: An Institutional Perspective, pp. 127-143, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
• Wynne, B. (2002): "Risk and Environmental as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology: Reflexivity Inside Out?", Current Sociology, 50 (3): 459-477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011392102050003010
• Wynne, B. (2005): "Risk as Globalizing 'Democratic' Discourse"? Framing Subjects and Citizens", in Leach, M.; Scoones, I. y Wynne, B. (eds.) (2005), Science and Citizens. Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, 66-82, London, Zed Books.