El discurso sobre las políticas de ciencia y tecnología: marcos y paradigmas

Referencias bibliográficas

• ALBORNOZ, M. (coord.), Ciencia, tecnología e innovación para el desarrollo y la cohesión social, Madrid, OEI, 2012.
• ALBORNOZ, M. & LÓPEZ CEREZO, J.A. (eds.), Ciencia, tecnología y universidad en Iberoamérica, Buenos Aires, Eudeba, 2010.
• BARBEN, D., “Changing Regimes of Science and Politics: Comparative and Transnational Perspectives for a World in Transition”, Science and Public Policy, 34 1, (2007), 55-69.
• BARRE, R., GIBBONS, M., MADDOX, J., MARTIN, B. & PAPON, P. (eds.), Science in Tomorrow's Europe, Paris, Economica Ltd, 1998.
• BELL, D., The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, New York, Penguin, 1973.
• BERMAN, E.P., Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.
• BLUME, S., “The Development of Dutch Science Policy in International Perspective 1965-1985”, RAWB Achtergrondstudies no. 14, Amsterdam, 1985.
• BOEKER, E. & GIBBONS, M. (eds.), Science, Society and Education. Amsterdam, Free University, 1978.
• BORETSKY, M., “Trends in US Technology: A Political Economist’s View”, American Scientist, 63 1, (1975), 70-82.
• BROOKS, H., “National Science Policy and Technological Innovation”, in Landau, R. & Rosenberg, N. (eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, 119-165, Washington DC, National Academic Press, 1985.
• BUSH, V., Science: The Endless Frontier, Washington, D.C., NSF, 1945.
• CANAAN, J.E. & SHUMAR, W. (eds.), Structure and Agency in the Neoliberal University. New York: Routledge, 2008.
• COOZENS, S., KALLERUD, E., ACKERS, L., GILL, B., HARPER, J., SANTOS PEREIRA T. & ZARB-ADAMI, N., Problems of Inequality in Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy, Project Deliverable #2, James Martin Institute for Science and Civilization, 2007.
• EDGERTON, D., “`The Linear Model´ Did not Exist: Reflections on the History and Historiography of Science and Research in Industry in the Twentieth Century”, in GRAFIN, K., WORMBS, N. & WILDMALM, S. (eds.), The Science-Industry Nexus: History, Policy, Implications, 31-57, New York, Science and History Publications, 2004.
• EIZAGUIRRE, A., “Mitos y paradojas de los sistemas de investigación”, Argumentos de razón técnica, 15 (2012), 81-109.
• ELZINGA, A. & JAMISON, A., “Changing Policy Agendas in Science and Technology”, in JASANOFF, S., MARKLE, G.E., PETERSON, J.C. & PINCH, T.J. (eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 572- 597, London, Sage, 1995.
• ETZKOWITZ, H. & LEYDESDORFF, L. (eds.), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-IndustryGovernment Relations, London, Pinter, 1997.
• EZHARI, Y., The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1990.
• FELLER, I. & COOZENS, S., A Science of Science and Innovation Policy Research Agenda, Working Papers #29, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2007.
• FREEMAN, C. & SOETE, L., Developing Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators: What We Can Learn from the Past, UNU-MERIT, Working Paper Series, Maastricht, 2007.
• GIBBONS, M., LIMOGES, C., NOWOTNY, H., SCHWARTZMAN, S., SCOTT, P. & TROW, M., The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London, Sage, 1994.
• GODIN, B., “Writing Performative History: The New “New Atlantis”, Social Studies of Science, 28 3, (1998), 465-483.
• GODIN, B., “The Obsession for Competitiveness and Its Impact on Statistics: The Construction of High-Technology Indicators”, Research Policy, 33 8 (2004), 1217-1229.
• GODIN, B., Measurement and Statistics on Science and Technology: 1920 to the Present, London, Routledge, 2005.
• GODIN, B., “The Linear Model of Innovation: The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework”, Science, Technology & Human Values, 31 6, (2006), 639-667.
• GODIN, B., “Science, Accounting and Statistics: The Input-Output Framework”, Research Policy, 36 9, (2007), 1388-1403.
• GODIN, B., The Making of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: Conceptual Frameworks as Narratives, 1945-2005, Montreal, Centre Urbanisation Culture Société, 2010.
• GÓMEZ CARIDAD, I. & BORDONS GANGAS, M., “Limitaciones en el uso de los indicadores bibliométricos para la evaluación científica”, Política Científica 46, (1996), 21-26.
• GREENBERG, D.S., The Politics of Pure Science, New York, New American Library, 1967.
• GUSTON, D.H., Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Science, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
• GUSTON, D.H. & BROWN, N., “Science, Democracy, and the Rigth to Research” Sci Eng Ethics, 15, (2009), 351-366.
• HART, D.M., Forged Consensus: Science, Technology, and Economic Policy in the United States, 1921-1953. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.
• HAUKNES, J. & WICKEN, O., “Innovation Policy in the Post-War Period: Trends and Patterns”, Oslo, STEP Group, Senter for innovasjonsforskning, Sintef Teknologiledelse, 1999.
• HAUKNES, J. & WICKEN, O., “Innovation Policy in the Post-War Period”, Oslo, STEP Group, Senter for innovasjonsforskning, Sintef Teknologiledelse, 2003.
• HESSELS, L.K. & VAN LENTE, H., “Re-thinking New Knowledge Production: A Literature Review and a Research Agenda”, Research Policy, 37, (2008), 740-760.
• IRVINE, J & MARTIN, B.R., Foresight in Science: Picking the Winners, London, Pinter, 1984.
• JAMISON, A., “Science and Technology in Postwar Europe”, in STONE, D. (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Postwar European History, 630-648, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012.
• KEVLES, D., The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America. New York: Vintage, 1997.
• KLEIMANN, D.L. & VALLAS, S.P., “Science, Capitalism, and the Rise of the `Knowledge Worker´: The Changing Structure of Knowledge Production in the United States”. Theory and Society, 30 4, (2001), 451- 492.
• KLINE, S.J. & ROSENBERG, N., “An overview of innovation”, in LANDAU, R. & ROSENBERG, N. (eds.): The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, 275-305, Washington, D.C., National Academy Press, 1986.
• LANE, R., "The Decline of Politics and Ideology in a Knowledgeable Society", American Sociological Review, 31, (1966), 649-662.
• LEDERMAN, L., Science. The End of the Frontier?, Washington, D.C., AAAS, 1991.
• LUNDVALL, B. (ed.), National System of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Londres, Pinter Publishers, 1992.
• MERTON, R., "A Note on Science and Democracy" Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, (1942), 115-126.
• MIETTINEN, R., National Innovation System: Scientific Concept or Political Rhetoric?, Helsinki, Edita, 2002.
• MIETTINEN, R., Innovation, Human Capabilities, and Democracy: Towards an Enabling Welfare State, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.
• MIROWSKI, P. & SENT, E-J., “The Commercialization of Science and the Response to STS”, in HACKETT, E.J., AMSTERDAMSKA, O., LYNCH, M. & WAJCMAN, J. (eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 635-689. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2008.
• NELSON, R.R., “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research”, Journal of Political Economy, 67, (1959), 297-306.
• NELSON, R.R. & Wright, G., “The Rise and Fall of American Technological Leadership: The Postwar Era in Historical Perspective”, Journal of Economic Literature, 30, (1992), 1931-1964.
• NOWOTNY, H., SCOTT, P. & GIBBONS, M., Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
• OEEC, International Cooperation in Scientific and Technical Research, Paris, OEEC, 1960.
• OECD, Science and the Policies of Governments, Paris, OECD, 1963a.
• OECD, Science, Economic Growth and Government Policy, Paris, OECD, 1963b.
• OECD, Ministers Talk about Science, Paris, OECD, 1964.
• OECD, Fundamental Research and the Policies of Governments, Paris, OECD, 1966a.
• OECD, Government and the Allocation of Resources to Science, Paris, OECD, 1966b.
• OECD, Government and Technical Innovation, Paris, OECD, 1966c.
• OECD, Gaps in Technology: General Report, Paris, OECD, 1968.
• OECD, The Conditions of Success in Technological Innovation, Paris, OECD, 1971.
• OECD, The Research System, Paris, OECD, 1972a.
• OECD, Science, Growth and Society: A New Perspective, Paris, OECD, 1972b.
• OECD, Technical Change and Economic Policy, Paris, OECD, 1980.
• OECD, New Technologies in the 1990s: A Socio-economic Strategy, Paris, OECD, 1988.
• OECD, Choosing Priorities in Science and Technology, Paris, OECD, 1991a.
• OECD, Technology in a Changing World, Paris, OECD, 1991b.
• OECD, Technology and the Economy: the Key Relationships, Paris, OECD, 1992.
• OECD, The Knowledge-Based Economy, Paris, OECD, 1996.
• OECD, Managing Innovation Systems, Paris, OECD, 1999.
• OECD, Innovative Networks: Co-operation in National Innovation Systems, Paris, OECD, 2001a.
• OECD, Innovative Clusters: Drivers of National Innovation Systems, Paris, OECD, 2001b.
• OECD, Innovative People: Mobility of Skilled Personnel in National Innovation Systems, Paris, OECD, 2001c.
• OECD, Dynamising National Innovation Systems, Paris, OECD, 2002.
• OECD, Science and Innovation Policy: Key Challenges and Opportunities, Paris, OECD, 2004.
• OECD, Governance of Innovation Systems, Paris, OECD, 2005.
• OECD, The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting a Head Start on Tomorrow, Paris, OECD, 2010.
• PRICE, H. D. de S., The Scientific Estate, New York, Oxford University Press, 1965.
• PRICE, H. D. de S., Little Science, Big Science, New York, Columbia University Press, 1963/1971.
• RUIVO, B., "`Phases´ or `Paradigms´ of Science Policy?", Science and Public Policy, 21 3, (1995), 157-164.
• SALOMON, J-J., "Science Policy Studies and the Development of Science Policy", in SPIEGEL-ROSING, I. & PRICE, D.S. (eds.), Science, Technology and Society, 43-70, London, Sage, 1977.
• SALOMON, J-J., “L´OECD et les politiques scientifiques”, Revueu pour l´histoire du CNRS, 3 (2000), 40-58.
• SALOMON, J-J, SAGASTI, F.R. y SACHS-JEANTET, C. (eds.), The Uncertain Quest: Science, Technology, and Development, Paris, United Nations University Press, 1998.
• SANCHO, R., “Indicadores bibliométricos utilizados en la evaluación de la ciencia y la tecnología”, Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 13 3/4 (1990), 842-865.
• SHILS, E. (comp.) Criteria for Scientific Development: Public Policy and National Goals, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1968.
• SHINN, T., “The Triple Helix and New Production of Knowledge: Prepackaged Thinking in Science and Technology”, Social Studies of Science, 32 4, (2002), 599-614.
• SLAUGHTER, S. & RHOADES, G., Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004.
• STHER, N., Knowledge and Economic Conduct: The Social Foundations of the Modern Economy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002. US President’s Scientific Research Board, Science and Public Policy, New York, Arno Press, 1947.
• VVAA, “The New Production of Knowledge”, Minerva nº monográfico, 41 3, (2003), 177-276.
• VVAA, “Science, Policy and Social Inequity”, Science and Public Policy nº monográfico, 34 2, (2007), 83-150.
• WEINBERG, A.M., Reflections on Big Science, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1967.
• ZIMAN, J., Prometeus Bond. Science in a Steady State, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994.
• ZIMAN, J., “‘Postacademic Science’: Constructing Knowledge with Networks and Norms”, Science Studies, 9, (1996), 67-80.