Mitos y paradojas de los sistemas de investigación

Referencias bibliográficas

• AGAZZI, E., El bien, el mal y la ciencia: las dimensiones éticas de la empresa científico-tecnológica, edición y traducción a cargo de R. Queraltó, Madrid, Tecnos, 1992.
• ARCHIBUGI, D., “In Defense of Public Science”, Going Global Conference, The Challenges for Knowledge-Based Economies, Helsinki, Finland, September 21-22 2006.
• BAUER, M., SHUKLA, R. & ALLUM, N. (eds.), The Culture of Science: How Does the Public Relate to Science Across the Globe, London, Routledge, 2011.
• BLUMENTHAL D., CAMPBELL, E.G., CAUSINO, N. & SEASHORE, K., "Participation of Life-science Faculty in Research Relationships with Industry", The New England Journal of Medicine, 335, (1996), 1734- 1739.
• BOZEMAN, B., “Public Value Mapping of Science Outcomes: Theory and Method”, Washington, DC, Center for Science, Policy, and Outcomes, 2003.
• BOZEMAN B. & SAREWITZ, D., “Public Values and Public Failure in US Science Policy”, Science and Public Policy, 32 2, (2005), 119-136.
• BROWN, N., “Hope Against Hype: Accountability in Biopasts, Presents and Futures”, Science Studies, 16 2, (2003), 3-21.
• BROWN, N. & MICHAEL, M., “A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects”, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15 1, (2003), 3-18.
• BROWN, N., BORUP, M., KONRAD, H. & VAN LENTE, H., “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology” (special issue), Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 18 3/4, (2006), 285-444.
• BRUNNER, R.D. & Ascher, W., "Science and Social Responsibility", Policy Sciences, 25, (1992), 295-331.
• CHAPMAN, A., Democratizing Technology: Risk, Responsability and the Regulation of Chemicals, Oxford, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007.
• CORTNER, H.J., "Making Science Relevant to Environmental Policy", Environmental Science & Policy, 3, (2000), 21-30.
• CROW, M.M., “None Dare Call It Hubris: The Limits of Knowledge”, Issues in Science and Technology Online , 23 (2), 2007, 1-4.
• ECHEVERRÍA, J., “El pluralismo axiológico de la ciencia”, Isegoría , 12, (1995), 44-79.
• ECHEVERRÍA, J., La revolución tecnocientífica, Mexico, FCE, 2003.
• EIZAGIRRE, A., “La precaución como principio de acción sostenible”. Isegoría, 44, (2011), 303-324.
• FARRELL, A. & JAEGER, J. (eds.), Assessments of Global and Regional Environmental Risks: Designing Processes for the Effective Use of Science in Decisionmaking, Washington, DC, Resources for the Future, 2005.
• FELT, Ulrike, WYNNE, B., STIRLING, A., CALLON, M., GONCALVES, ME. y otros, Science and Governance: taking European Knowledge Society Seriously, Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to DG Research, 2007
• FISCHER, F., Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices, New York, Oxford University Press. 2003.
• FRAZZETTO, G.,"The Changing Identity of the Scientists", EMBO reports 5 1, (2004), 18-20.
• FULLER, S., Science, Buckingham, Open University Press, 1997. FULLER, S., The Governance of Science, Buckingham, Open University Press,
• 2000. GELINGS, A.C. & THIER, S.O. "Medical Innovation and Institutional
• Interdependence: Rethinking University-Industry Connections", The Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, (2002), 72-77.
• GODIN, B., The Making of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: Conceptual Frameworks as Narratives, 1945-2005, Montreal, Centre Urbanisation Culture Société, 2009.
• GODIN, B. & DORÉ, C., Measuring the Impacts of Science: Beyond the Economic Dimension, Montreal, Centre Urbanisation Culture Société, 2005.
• GREENBERG, D.S., Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2001.
• GUSTON, D. & Brown, N., “Science, Democracy, and the Rigth to Research”, Sci Eng Ethics, 15, (2009), 351-366.
• HOPPE, R., “Policy analysis, science and politics: from ‘speaking truth to power’ to ‘making sense together’”, Science and Public Policy, 26 3, 1999, 201-210.
• HORST, M., “Public Expectations of Gene Therapy: Scientific Futures and their Performative Effects on Scientific Citizenship”, Science, Technology and Human Values, 32 2, 2007, 150-171.
• JASANOFF, S., The Fifth Branch: Scientific Advisors as Policymakers, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1990.
• KAFATOS, F., "A Revolutionary Landscape: The Restructuring of Biology and Its Convergence with Medicine", Journal of Molecular Biology , 319, 2002, 861-867.
• KENNEY, M., Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1986.
• KOSTOFF, R.N., “The Principles and Practices of Peer Review”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 3, (1997), 19-34.
• KRIMSKY, S., Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research?, Oxford, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003.
• http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/TheMakingOfScience.pdf
• http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/TheMakingOfScience.pdf
• http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/Godin_Dore_Impacts.pdf
• http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/Godin_Dore_Impacts.pdf
• KRIMSKY, S. & Rothenberg, L.S., "Financial Interest and Its Disclosure in Scientific Publications", The Journal of the American Medical Association, 280 3, (1998), 225-226.
• LANE, R., "The Decline of Politics and Ideology in a Knowledgeable Society" American Sociological Review, 31, (1966), 649-662.
• LASSWELL, H.D., "The Political Science of Science: An Inquiry into the Possible Reconciliation of Mastery and Freedom", American Political Science Review, 50, (1956), 961-979.
• LEDERMAN, L.M., "Science: The End of the Frontier?", Science, 251 4990, (1991), 231.
• MERTON, R., "A Note on Science and Democracy", Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, (1942), 115-126.
• MERTON, R.K., La sociología de la ciencia, Madrid, Alianza, 1977. MIROWSKI, P. & VAN HORN, R., “The Contract Research Organization and
• the Commercialization of Scientific Research” Social Studies of Science, 35 4, (2005), 503-548.
• MUKERJI, C., A Fragile Power: Scientists and the State, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1989
• NATURE, "Is the University-industrial Complex out of Control?", Nature 409 6817, (2001), 119.
• NOWOTNY, H., “Society in Science: The Next Phase in an Impetuous Relationship”,Keynote speech at the Science and Society Forum, Brussels, Mar 9-11, 2005.
• OWEN-SMITH, J., RICCABONI, M., PAMMOLLI, F. & POWELL, W.W., "A Comparison of U.S. and European University-Industry Relations in the Life Sciences", Management Science, 48 1, 2002, 24-43.
• PARSON, E. & CLARK, W., “Sustainable Development and Social Learning”. Faculty Research Working Paper Series, 1993, R93-47.
• POLANYI, M., "The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory", Minerva 1, 1962, 54-73.
• PRICE, H. D. de S., The Scientific Estate, New York, Oxford University Press, 1965.
• PRIMACK, Joel R. & F. VON HIPPEL, Advise and Dissent: Scientists in the Political Arena, New York, NY, Basic Books, Inc, 1994.
• SÁNCHEZ RON, J.M., “Ciencia, científicos y guerra en el siglo XX: algunas cuestiones ético-morales” Isegoría 12, (1995), 119-136
• SAREWITZ, D., Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology and the Politics of Progress, Philadelphia, Temple of University Press, 1996,
• SAREWITZ, D. & PIELKE, R.A., “The Neglected Heart of Science Policy: Reconciling Supply of and Demand for Science”, Environmental Science & Policy, 10, (2007), 5-16.
• SCHNEIDER, A.L. & INGRAM, H., Policy Design for Democracy, Lawrence, KS, University Press of Kansas, 1997.
• SELIN, C., “Expectations and the Emergence of Nanotechnology”, Science, Technology and Human Values, 32 2, (2007), 196-220.
• SERVICE, R.F.."Berkeley Puts all Its Eggs in Two Baskets", Science 286 5438, (1999), 226-227.
• SNOW, C.P., The New Man, London, Macmillan, 1957. TAVERNE, D., “Let's be Sensible About Public Participation”, Nature 432
• 7011, (2004), 883. THACKRAY, A.,(ed.), Private Science: Biotechnology and the Rise of the
• Molecular Sciences, Philadelphia, University of Philadelphia Press, 1998. WEINBERG, S., Dreams of a Final Theory, New York, Pantheon, 1993. WILSDON, J., WYNNE, B. & STILGOE, J., The Public Value of Science: Or
• How to Ensure that Science Really Matters, London, Demos, 2005. WINNER, L., The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High
• Technology, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1989. WOLPERT, L., The Unnatural Nature of Science, London, Faber, 1992 WYNNE, B., "Creating Public Alienation: Expert Cultures of Risk and Ethics on
• GMOs", Science as Cultures 10 4, (2011), 445-481. WYNNE, B., "Risk and Environmental as Legitimatory Discourses of
• Technology: Reflexivity Inside Out?", Current Sociology 50 3, (2002), 459-477.
• ZIMAN, J., "Why Must Scientists Become More Ethically Sensitive Than They Used to Be?", Science, 282 5395, (1998), 1813-1814.