Nola bilatzen dute informazioa unibertsitate-ikasleek?Mondragon Unibertsitateko ikus-entzunezko ikasleen kasua

  1. Egaña Osa, Txema
  2. Zuberogoitia Espilla, Aitor
  3. Pavón Arrizabalaga, Amaia
Revista:
Tantak: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko hezkuntza aldizkaria

ISSN: 0214-9753

Año de publicación: 2012

Volumen: 24

Número: 2

Páginas: 53-76

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Tantak: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko hezkuntza aldizkaria

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Al-Saleh, Y. (2004). Graduate students’ information needs from electronic information resources in Saudi Arabia [doktorego-tesia]. Florida (USA): Florida State University.
  • ACRL [Association Of College And Research Library] (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/ ilcomstan.html (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Avdic, A.; Eklund, A. (2010). «Searching reference databases: what students experience and what teachers believe that students experience». Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 2010, 42(4), 224-235.
  • Banwell, L.; Coulson, G. (2004). «Users and user study methodology: the JUBILEE Project». In: Information Research, 9(2). http://InformationR.net/ ir/9-2/paper167.html (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Bates, M.J. (1989). «The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface». In: Online Review, 13(5), 407-424.
  • Beile, P.M. (2005). Development and validation of the Beile test of information literacy for education (B-Tiled) [doktorego-tesia]. Florida, AEB: University of Central Florida.
  • Benitez de Vendrell, N. (2007). Las conductas de búsqueda de información en la web. Una mirada humanística y social [doktorego-tesia]. Granada: Universidad de Granada.
  • British Library; JICS (2008). Information behaviour of the researcher of the future [ikerketa-txostena]. www.bl.uk/news/pdf/googlegen.pdf (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Castells, M. (2008). «El poder tiene miedo de Internet». In: Diario El País, Suplemento Domingo. [Madrid] (2008-01-06), 10.
  • CAUL [Council of Australian university librarians] & ANZIIL [Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy] (2004). Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework: Principles, standards and practice. Second edition. http://www.caul.edu.au/info-literacy/InfoLiteracyFramework. pdf (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • CICLE [Committee of Inquiry into the Changing Learner Experience] (2009). Higher Education in a Web 2.0 World. Bristol: JISC. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/ media/documents/publications/heweb20rptv1.pdf (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • CILIP [Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals] (2004). Information literacy: The skills. http://www.cilip.org.uk/policyadvocacy/ informationliteracy/definition/skills.htm (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Critchfield, R. (2005). The developmet of an information literacy indicator for incoming college freshmen [doktorego-tesia]. AEB: Nova Southeastern University.
  • Dunsker, E.K. (2005). Development and validation of a systematically designed unit for online information literacy and its effect on student performance for Internet search training [doktorego-tesia]. Florida: University of Central Florida.
  • EDUTEKA (2006). Modelo Gavilán: una propuesta para el desarrollo de la competencia para manejar la información. http://www.eduteka.org/modulos.php? catx=1&idSubX=8&ida=487&art=1 (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Egaña, T. (2008). «Informazioa bilatzen konpetenteak dira unibertsitateko ikasleak? Mondragon Unibertsitateko Irakasle Ikasketetako 1. mailako ikasleen kasua». In: Tantak: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko hezkuntza aldizkaria, 40.
  • Egaña, T. (2010). Nola bilatzen, ebaluatzen eta aukeratzen dute informazioa unibertsitate-ikasleek? [doktore-tesia]. Eskoriatza: Mondragon Unibertsitatea. http://sarea.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/tesia-txemaegana.pdf (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • EPIC [Electronic Publishing Initiative at Columbia] (2004). The Electronic Publishing Initiative at Columbia (EPIC) online survey of college students: Executive summary. Ohio, AEB: Columbia University. www.epic.columbia.edu/ eval/find09/find09.html (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • ETS [Education Testing Service] (2008). iSkills: Information and Communication Technology Literacy Test. www.ets.org/iskills (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Fosmire, M.; Macklin, A. (2002). Riding the active learning wave: ProblemBased Learning as a catalyst for creating facultylibrarian instructional partnerships. http://www.istl.org/02-spring/article2.html (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Fuentes Agusti, M. (2006). Estratègies de cerca i selecció d’informació a internet. Anàlisis de les modalitats de cerca i selecció d’informació a Internet dels estudiants de quart curs d’educació secundària obligatòria [doktorego-tesia]. Barcelona: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
  • Fuentes Agusti, M.; Monereo, C. (2008). «Cómo buscan información en Internet los adolescentes». In: Investigación en la escuela, 64, 45-58.
  • Hart, C.T. (2008). Exploring the information-seeking behaviour of the staff and students of the Florida Virtual School: a case study [doktorego-tesia]. Florida: Florida State University.
  • Heinström, J. (2002). Fast surfers, broad scanners and deep divers: personality and information-seeking behaviour [doktorego-tesia]. Turku, Finland: Abo Akademi University.
  • Hirsh, S.; Dinkelacker, J. (2004). «Seeking information in order to produce information: an empirical study at Hewlett Packard labs». Journal of the american society for information science and technology, 2004, 55(9), 807-817.
  • IFLA [International Federation of Library Associations] (2006). Guidelines on Information Literacy for Lifelong Learning. http://www.ifla.org/VII/s42/pub/ILguidelines2006.pdf (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • ISTE [International Society for Technology in Education] (2007). National Educational Technology Standards for Students (NETS.S). http://www.iste.org/ Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForStudents/2007Standards/NETS_for_ Students_2007.htm (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Johnson, M.; Greatorex, J. (2008). «Judging text presented on screen: implications for validity». In: E-Learning, 5(1), 40-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/ elea.2008.5.1.40 (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Kakai, M.; Ikoja-Odongo, R.; Kigongo-Bukenya, I.M.N. (2004). «A study of the information seeking behavior of undergraduate students of Makerere university», Uganda. World libraries, 14, 1.
  • Kuiper, E.; Volman, M.; Terwel, J. (2008). «Students’ use of Web literacy skills and strategies: searching, reading and evaluating Web information». In: Information research 13(3). http://informationr.net/ir/13-3/paper351.html (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Kuhlthau, C. (2008). «From information to meaning: confronting challenges of the Twenty-fi rst century». In: Libri, 2008, vol. 58, pp. 66-73. http://www. librijournal.org/pdf/2008-2pp66-73.pdf (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Macklin, A.; Fosmire, M. (2004). «A blueprint of progress: collaborating with faculty to integrate information literacy into the curriculum at Perdue University». In: Resource sharing and information networks, 17(1-2), 43-56.
  • Manowaluilou, N. (2008). The importance of undergraduate’s computer competency and information literacy skills: Marketing faculty’s perspectives in Thailand [doktorego-tesia]. AEB: University of Missouri-Columbia. www.crepuq. qc.ca/documents/bibl/formation/studies_Ang.pdf (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Maughan, P.D. (2001). «Assessing information literacy among undergraduates: a discussion of the literature and the University of California-Berkeley assessment experience». College & Research Libraries, 62(1), 71-85.
  • Meneses, J. et al. (2005). «Construcción de estrategias sistemáticas para la búsqueda exhaustiva de información en internet: un marco de toma de decisiones aplicado a la información sobre psicología de la salud». In: Information Research, 10(3). http://informationr.net/ir/10-3/paper231.html (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Murillo, S.; Mena, L. (2006). Detectives y camaleones: el grupo de discusión. Una propuesta para la investigación cualitativa. Madrid. Talasa.
  • Nachmias, R.; Mioduser D.; Shemla, A. (2000). «Internet usage by students in an Israeli high school». In: Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(1), 55-73.
  • Nazim, M.; Saraf, S. (2006). «Information searching habits of Internet users: A users’ study of Banaras Hindu University». In: Annals of Library & Information Studies, 53(4), 213-218. http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00012392/ (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Oblinger D.; Hawkins B. (2006). «The Myth about Students «Our students are technologically competent». In: Educause Review, March/April, 12-13.
  • Oakleaf, M.J. (2006). Assessing information literacy skills: a rubric approach [doktorego-tesia]. AEB: University of North Carolina.
  • OCLC [Online Computer Library Center] (2005). College Students’ Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources [ikerketa-txostena]. www.oclc.org/ reports/perceptionscollege.htm (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Pew Internet & American Life Project (2008). Writing, technology and teens [ikerketa-txostena]. http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/247/report_display.asp (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Price de Solla, D.J. (1965). «Networks of Scientific Papers: The pattern of bibliographic references indicates the nature of the scientific research front». In: Science, 149(3683), 510-515. http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/pricenet works1965.pdf (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Reveromb, P.L. (2005). Internet information literacy: A study of older adults [doktorego-tesia]. Florida, AEB: Syracuse University.
  • Seamans, N.H. (2001). Information literacy: a study of freshman students’ perceptions, with recommendations [doktorego-tesia]. Virginia (AEB): Virginia State University.
  • Soo Young, R.; Hilligoss, B. (2008). College students’ credibility judgments in the information-seeking process: Digital media, youth, and credibility. Cambridge, MA, AEB: The MIT Press.
  • Stubbings, R.; Franklin, G. (2005). «More to life than Google: A journey for PhD students». In: JeLit 2(2). http://www.jelit.org/61/ (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Suarez Ortega, M. (2005). El grupo de discusión. Una herramienta para la investigación cualitativa. Barcelona. Laertes.
  • Sureda J.; Comas, R. (2006). Internet como fuente de documentación académica entre estudiantes universitarios. Una aproximación a partir del alumnado de Educación Social de la Universitat de les Illes Balears (UIB). Palma de Mallorca: Xarxa Segura IB. http://www.xarxasegura.net/descarga/Cerques%20 a%20Internet-1.pdf (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Tenopir, C.; Rowlands, I. (2008). «Age-related information behaviour». In: British Library; JICS (2008). Information behaviour of the researcher of the future. www.bl.uk/news/pdf/googlegen.pdf (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • UNESCO (2003). Informazioan alfabetatua den gizarterantz. Pragako adierazpena. http://www.cobdc.org/grups/alfincat/documents.html (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).
  • Valenza J.K. (2006). «They might be gurus». In: Teacher Librarian 34(1), 18-26. Walraben, A.; Brand-Gruwel, S.; Boshuisen, H. (2009). «How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information». Computers & Education, 2009, 52, 234-246.
  • Williams, P. & Rowlands, I. (2008). «The literature on young people and their information behaviour». In: British Library; JICS (2008). Information behaviour of the researcher of the future. www.bl.uk/news/pdf/googlegen.pdf (2010eko otsailaren 1ean kontsultatua).