Nola ebaluatzen dute Interneteko informazioa unibertsitate-ikasleek?

  1. Egaña Osa, Txema
Revista:
Gogoa: Euskal Herriko Unibersitateko hizkuntza, ezagutza, komunikazio eta ekintzari buruzko aldizkaria

ISSN: 1577-9424

Año de publicación: 2010

Volumen: 10

Número: 1-2

Páginas: 55-86

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Gogoa: Euskal Herriko Unibersitateko hizkuntza, ezagutza, komunikazio eta ekintzari buruzko aldizkaria

Resumen

In an 1nformation Society, a person must be able to recognize when information is needed and have the competence to loca te, evaluate, and use information effectively. In this way, citizens become prepared for lifelong learning, beca use they can always find the information needed for any task or decision at hand. This study was intended to understand how university students evaluate information found on the Internet. The study was carried out at Mondragon University (Basque Country). Quantitative data were collected using a questionnaire with information searching tasks and opinion items. Qualitative data were collected thraugh five different focus groups. Participants were students and their teachers. Findings suggest that when evaluating the information on the Internet, students mainly check if the information is updated, where that information has been published and how the document looks like.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Al-Saleh, Y. (2004). Graduate students´ information needs from electronic information resources in Saudi Arabia. [Doktorego-tesia]. Florida (USA): Florida State University.
  • ACRL [Association Of College And Research Library] (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/ilcomstan.html.
  • Agosto, D. (2002). «A model of young people’s decision-making in using the Web». Library & information science research, 24 (4): 311-341. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07408188
  • Benitez de Vendrell, B. (2007). Las conductas de búsqueda de información en la web. Una mirada humanística y social. [Doktorego-tesia]. Granada: Universidad de Granada.
  • Beile O´Neil, P. M. (2005). Development and validation of the Beile test of information literacy for education (B-Tiled). [Doktorego-tesia]. Florida, AEB: University of Central Florida.
  • Brem, S. K:; Boyes, A. J. (2000). «Using critical thinking to conduct effective searches of online resources». Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7(7). http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=7
  • British Library; JICS (2008). Information behaviour of the researcher of the future. [Ikerketa-txostena]. www.bl.uk/news/pdf/googlegen.pdf
  • Callejo, J. (2001). El grupo de discusión: Introducción a una práctica de investigación. Madrid: Ariel.
  • Calkins, S.; Kelley, M. (2007). «Evaluating Internet and Scholarly Sources across the Disciplines: Two Case Studies». College Teaching, 55 (4):151-156
  • CILIP [Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals] (2004). Information literacy: The skills.
  • Critchfiled, R. (2005). The developmet of an information literacy indicator for incoming college freshmen. [Doktorego-tesia]. AEB: Nova Southeastern University.
  • Davis, P. (2003). «Effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behaviour: Guiding student scholarship in a networked age». Libraries and Academic 3 (1): 41-51.
  • Dunsker, E. K. (2005). Development and validation of a systematically designed unit for online information literacy and its effect on student performance for Internet search training. [Doktorego-tesia]. Florida: University of Central Florida.
  • España. Real Decreto 1631/2006, de 29 de diciembre, por el que se establecen las enseñanzas mínimas correspondientes a la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. 5 de enero de 2007. http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2007/01/05/pdfs/A00677-00773.pdf
  • ETS [Education Testing Service] (2008). iSkills: Information and Communication Technology Literacy Test. www.ets.org/iskills
  • Euskadi. 2007ko. 175. dekretua, urriaren 16koa, Euskal Autonomia Erkidegoko Oinarrizko Hezkuntzaren curriculuma sortu eta ezartzekoa. http://213.96.129.186:82/Blog/Curriculuma2007/2007koCurriculumDekretuaEHAAnArgitaratutakoa.pdf
  • Fitzgerald, M. A. (1999). «Evaluating information: An information literacy challenge». School Library Media Research 2.
  • Flanagin, A.; Metzger, M. (2007). «The role of site features, user atributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information». New media society 9 (2): 319-342.
  • Fogg, B. J.; Soohoo, C.; Danielson, D. R.; Marable, L.; Stanford, J.;Tauber, E. R. (2003). How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites? A study with over 2,500 participants. Paper presented at the ACM conference on Designing for User Experiences, San Francisco, CA.
  • Fuentes Agusti, M. (2006). Estratègies de cerca i selecció d’informació a internet. Anàlisis de les modalitats de cerca i selecció d’informació a Internet dels estudiants de quart curs d’educació secundària obligatòria. [Doktorego-tesia]. Barcelona: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
  • Hilligoss, B. & Rieh, S.Y. (2008). «Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: construct, heuristics and interaction in context». Information Processing & Management, 44(4): 1467-1484.
  • Iding, M.; Crosby, M.; Auernheimer, B.; Klemm, E. (2009). «Web site credibility: Why do people believe what they believe?» Instructional Science 37 (1): 43-63 http://www.springerlink.com/content/1q4826801775ntq8/
  • ISTE [International Society for Technology in Education] (2007). National Educational Technology Standards for Students (NETS.S). http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForStudents/2007Standards/NETS_for_Students_2007.htm
  • Kiili, C.; Laurinen, L.; Martinen, M. (2008). «Students Evaluating Internet Sources: From Versatile Evaluators to Uncritical Readers». Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39 (1): 75-95
  • Lankes, R.D. (2008). «Trusting the Internet: new approaches to credibility tools». In M.J. Metzger & A.J. Flanagin (arg.), Digital media, youth and credibility (101-121 or.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Maki, P. I. (2002). «Developing an assessment plan to learn about students learning». Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28 (1/2): 8-13.
  • Mason, L.; Boldrin, A.; Ariasi, N. (2010). «Searching the Web to learn about a controversial topic: Are students epistemically active?» Metacognition and learning 5 (1): 67-90. http://www.springerlink.com/content/b235514853244106/
  • Metzger, M.; Mlanagin, A.; Zwarun, L. (2003). «College student web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior». Computers & Education 41(3): 271-290.
  • Metzger, M.; Flanagin, A. (arg.) (2008). Digital media, youth and credibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Murillo, S.; Mena, L. (2006). Detectives y camaleones: el grupo de discusión. Una propuesta para la investigación cualitativa. Madrid. Talasa.
  • Oakleaf, M. J. (2006). Assessing information literacy skills: a rubric approach. [Doktoregotesia]. AEB: University of North Carolina.
  • OCLC [Online Computer Library Center] (2005). College Students’ Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources. [Ikerketa-txostena]. www.oclc.org/reports/perceptionscollege.htm
  • Pardo, A; San Martin, R. (2001). Análisis de datos en psicología II. Madrid: Piramide.
  • Parlamento Europeo y Consejo de la Unión Europea (2006). Recomendación del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 18 de diciembre de 2006, sobre las competencias clave para el aprendizaje permanente. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea, pp. L 394/10-18 (30 de diciembre de 2006). http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:394:0010:0018:ES:PDF
  • Pew Internet & American Life Project (2005). Search engine users: Internet searchers are confident, satisfied and trusting – but they are also unaware and naïve. [Ikerketa-txostena]. http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/146/report_display.asp
  • Reveromb, P. L. (2005). Internet information literacy: A study of older adults. [Doktoregotesia]. Florida, AEB: Syracuse University.
  • Soo Young, R; Hilligoss, B. (2008). College students’ credibility judgments in the information-seeking process: Digital media, youth, and credibility. Cambridge, MA, AEB: The MIT Press.
  • Snow, E. (2008). Can college students evaluate information sources? Validating a web-based assessment of evaluation skills. [Doktorego-tesia]. AEB: University of Oregon.
  • Suarez Ortega, M. (2005). El grupo de discusión. Una herramienta para la investigación cualitativa. Barcelona. Laertes.
  • Sundin, O. & Francke, H. (2009). «In search of credibility: pupils’ information practices in learning environments». Information Research 14(4). http://InformationR.net/ir/14-4/paper418.html
  • Sureda J.; Comas, R. (2006). Internet como fuente de documentación academica entre estudiantes universitarios. Una aproximación a partir del alumnado de Educación Social de la Universitat de les Illes Balears (UIB). Palma de Mallorca: Xarxa Segura IB. http://www.xarxasegura.net/descarga/Cerques%20a%20Internet-1.pdf
  • UNESCO (2003). Informazioan alfabetatua den gizarterantz. Pragako adierazpena. http://www.cobdc.org/grups/alfincat/documents.html
  • Walraven, A.; Brand-Gruwel, S.; Boshuizen, H. (2009) «How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information». Computers & Education 52 (1): 234-246. http://doc.utwente.nl/60704/
  • Whitmire, E. (2004). «The relationship between undergraduates epistemological beliefs, reflective judment, and their information seeking behavior». Information Processing & Management 40(1): 97-111.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet