Valoración social de la ciencia y la tecnología

Referencias bibliográficas

• BAUER, M.W. N. ALLUMN Y S. MILLER (2007), "What Can We Learn from 25 Years of PUS Survey Research? Libera- ting and Expanding the Agenda”, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 17, n*1, pp. 79-95.
• BEPCAG [Biotechnology and the European Public Concerted Action Group] (1997): “Europe Ambivalent on Biotechnology”. Nature, n* 387, pp. 845-847.
• BODMER, W. (1985), The Public Understanding of Science, The Royal Society, London.
• DIERKES, M.; GROTE, C.V. (eds.) (2000), Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology, Amsterdam, Harwood Academic Publishers.
• DURANT, J., M.W. BAUER y G. GASKELL (eds.) (1998), Biotechnology in the Public Sphere. A European Source Book, Science Museum Publications, London.
• EUSTAT (2008), Estadística sobre Actividades de Investigación Científica y Desarrollo Tecnológico (I+D), Análisis de Resultados, EUSTAT, Vitoria/Gasteiz.
• GASKELL, G. y M. BAUER (eds.) (2001), Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy, National Museum of Science and Industry, London.
• GOBIERNO VASCO (2008), Plan de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación 2010, Servicio de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco, Vitoria/Gasteiz
• IRWIN, A. y B. WYNNE (eds.) (1996), Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
• JASANOFF, S. (2005), Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N)J.
• KALLERUD, E. y |. RAMBERG (2002), “The Order of Discourse in Surveys of Public Understanding of Science”. Public Understanding of Science, vol. 11, n* 3, pp. 213-224.
• LASSEN, J. y A. JAMISON (2006), “Genetic Technologies Meet the Public: The Discourses of Concern”, Science, Technology €: Human Values, vol. 31, n* 1, pp. 8-28.
• LEACH, M,, |. SCOONES y B. WYNNE (eds.) (2005), Science and Citizens. Globalization €: The Challenge of Engagement, Zed Books, London.
• MICHAEL, M. (1992), “Lay Discourses of Science: Science-in-general, Science-in Particular, and Self”, Science, Technolo- gy € Human Values, vol. 17, n* 3, pp. 313-333.
• MICHAEL, M. (2002) “Comprehension, Apprehension, Prehension: Heterogeneity and the Public Understanding of Science”, Science, Technology 8: Human Values, vol. 27, n* 3, pp. 357-378.
• MILLER, J.D. (1998), “The Measurement of Civic Scientific Literacy”, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 7, n? 3, pp. 203-223.
• MILLER, J.D. (2004), "Public Understanding of, and Attitudes Toward, Scientific Research: What We Know and What We Need to Know", Public Understanding of Science, vol. 13, n* 3, pp. 273-294.
• MURPHY, J. (2006), Governing Technology for Sustainability, Rowman €: Littlefield Publishers, Oxford.
• OLAZARAN, M. y B. OTERO (2006), “Zientzia eta Teknologia”, en ZURBANO, M. y J. LEONARDO (eds.), Euskal AEko 2006ko Txosten Sozioekonomikoa, pp. 419-457, EUSTAT, Vitoria/Gasteiz.
• WYNNE, B. (1987), “Unruly Technology: Practical Rules, Impractical Discourses and Public Understanding”, Social Studies of Science, vol. 18, nº 1, pp. 147-167.
• ZURBANO, M. (2008), “Gobernanza e innovación social. El caso de las políticas públicas en materia de ciencia y tecnología en Euskadi”, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, nº 60, pp. 73-93.