Double object constructions in L3 Englishan exploratory study of morphological and semantic constraints

  1. Imaz Agirre, Ainara
  2. García Mayo, María del Pilar
Revista:
IJES: international journal of English studies

ISSN: 1578-7044,  1989-6131

Año de publicación: 2014

Volumen: 14

Número: 2

Páginas: 1-20

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/J.179651 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: IJES: international journal of English studies

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Este estudio analiza la adquisición de estructuras de doble objeto (double object construction) (DOCs) (Susan gave Peter an apple) por parte de 90 bilingües de euskara/castellano con inglés como tercera lengua (L3). El objetivo de este estudio es examinar (i) si los aprendices establecen diferencias a la hora de aceptar DOCs vs. estructuras preposicionales (PPCs) (Susan gave an apple to Peter), (ii) si muestran sensibilidad a las restricciones morfológicas y semánticas de los DOCs en inglés y (iii) si se observan efectos en base al nivel de conocimiento de inglés de los participantes. Los resultados obtenidos de una tarea de lectura auto-dirigida y una tarea de lectura automática indican que los bilingües euskara/castellano muestran mayor precisión en propiedades morfosintácticas que en propiedades semánticas. A pesar de las dificultades encontradas con respecto a las restricciones morfológicas y semánticas, el mayor nivel de conocimiento de la lengua parece facilitar la superación de las mismas

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arregi, E. (2003). On Dative Alternations in Basque. Manuscript. University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU).
  • Arregi, E. & Ormazabal, J. (2003). Aditz ditrantsitiboen barne-egitura (The internal structure of ditransitive verbs). In J. M. Makazaga & B. Oyharçabal (Eds.), Euskal gramatikari buruzko eta literaturari buruzko ikerketak XXI. mendearen atarian. Gramatika gaiak (Studies on Basque grammar and literature in the XXI century. Grammar topics) (pp. 119-136). Bilbo: Euskaltzaindia.
  • Artiagoitia, X. (2000). Hatsarreak eta parametroak lantzen (Working on principles and parameters). Gasteiz: University of the Basque/Country (UPV/EHU) and Arabako Foru Aldundia.
  • Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Cuervo, M. C. (2007). Double object in Spanish as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 583-615.
  • Demonte, V. (1995). Dative alternation in Spanish. Probus, 7, 5-30.
  • Elordieta, A. (2001). Verb Movement and Constituent Permutation in Basque. Utrecht: LOT.
  • Fernández, B. (1997). Egiturazko kasuaren erkaketa euskaraz (The comparison of structural case in Basque). Bilbo: University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU).
  • Fernández, B. & Ortiz de Urbina, J. (2010). Datiboa hiztegian (Datives in the dictionary). Bilbao: University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU).
  • García Mayo, M. P. & Rothman, J. (2012). L3 morphosyntax in the generative tradition: From the initial state and beyond. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, S. Flynn & J. Rothman (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood (pp. 9-32). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Haegeman, L. & Guéron, J. (1999). English Grammar: A Generative Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Hawkins, R. (1987). Markedness and the acquisition of the English dative alternation by L2 speakers. Second Language Research, 29, 20-55.
  • Kang, S. (2011). The acquisition of English dative constructions by Korean EFL children. Proceedings of The 16th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics (pp. 62-67). Retrieved from the Internet on 1 April, 2013.
  • Kay, P. (2001). Argument Structure Constructions and the Argument-Adjunct Distinction. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
  • Larson, R. K. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 335-391.
  • Marantz, A. (1993). Implications for asymmetries in double object construction. In S. Mchombo (Ed.), Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Grammar (pp. 113-151). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
  • Mazurkewich, I. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation by second language learners and linguistic theory and linguistic theory. Language Learning, 34, 91-109.
  • Mazurkewich, I. (1985). Syntactic markedness and language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition, 7, 15-36.
  • Mazurkewich, I. & White, L. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation: Unlearning overgeneralizations. Cognition, 16, 261-283.
  • Oh, E. (2010). Recovery from first language transfer: The second language acquisition of double objects by Korean speakers. Second Language Research, 26, 407-439.
  • Oh, E. & Zubizarreta, M. L. (2003). Does morphology affect transfer? The acquisition of English double objects by Korean native speakers. In A. Burgos, L. Micciulla & C. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 402-413). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • Oh, E. & Zubizarreta, M. L. (2006a). Against morphological transfer. In K. U. Deen, J. Nomura, B. Schulz & B. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition: North America (pp. 261-272). Honolulu, HI: University of Connecticut.
  • Oh, E. & Zubizarreta, M. L. (2006b). A Case Study of Structural Transfer: The Acquisition of English Double Objects by Adult Korean Speakers. Unpublished manuscript, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Perpiñan, S. & Montrul, S. (2006). On binding asymmetries in dative alternation construction in L2 Spanish. In C. A. Klee & T. L. Face (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 135-148). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
  • Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Pinker, S. 1989. Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R. A. (1994). Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In: T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar (pp. 317-368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40-72.
  • Slabakova, R. & Montrul, S. (2002). On viewpoint aspect and its L2 acquisition: A UG perspective. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.) Tense-aspect morphology in L2 acquisition (pp. 363-395). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  • Syndicate, U.C.L.E. (2001) Quick Placement Test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Whong-Barr, M. and Schwartz, B. D. (2002). Morphological and syntactic transfer in child L2 acquisition of the English dative alternation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 579- 616.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet