Step-by-step method for district renovation through community engagement and urban planning to foster local economic development and improve the quality of life

  1. Nicolás Buxens, Olatz 2
  2. URRA URIARTE, SILVIA 2
  3. SOPELANA, AMAIA 2
  4. Gonzalez Ochoantesana, Itsaso 1
  5. Landa Oregi, Idoia 1
  1. 1 Mondragon Unibertsitatea, Spain
  2. 2 Fundación Tecnalia Research and Innovation, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Spain
Proceedings:
WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment

ISSN: 1743-3541,  1746-448X

ISBN: 978-1-78466-489-3,  978-1-78466-490-9

Year of publication: 2024

Volume: 262

Pages: 229-241

Type: Conference paper

DOI: 10.2495/SDP240191 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

Related Projects

Digitally enabled social district renovation processes for age-friendly environments driving social innovation and local economic development (2022-2025)

Abstract

Reaching environmental targets set by the European Union (EU) requires, among other intervention areas, the energy renovation of the existing building stock. Current studies show that the renovation rate is more than two times less than what is necessary to reach the targets. Most implemented renovations across the EU reach just a small amount of energy savings. At the same time, their built environment presents habitability and accessibility problems which require regeneration processes at the district scale. In any case, the renovation rates are low to reach EU targets and milestones for 2030, 2040 and 2050. Therefore, an integral renovation process supporting district-level approaches to renovation could help if it addresses the quality of the urban space, the urban accessibility, and the social and economic challenges. Moreover, such processes need to be carried out through a participatory approach to cultivate active engagement and collaboration among community members, thereby enhancing the sustainability of renovation initiatives. This paper proposes an integrated renovation methodology for guaranteeing and fostering an integral renovation approach by providing decision-makers and stakeholders with sound support concerning the identification, selection and prioritisation of the renovation initiatives. The proposed methodology is rooted in well-established step-based methods which contemplate human-centred approaches to technology development with social innovation guaranteeing citizens’ participation and engagement. The methodology is demonstrated using a case study in Spain. The main outcomes demonstrate that the characterisation of both the buildings of the neighbourhood (and its physical diagnosis) and the neighbour’s profile allows for effectively anticipating the needs of the residents concerning the neighbourhood and buildings. The ultimate purpose is to provide recommendations and lessons learned for its replicability in neighbourhoods with similar characteristics since the method paves a promising basis for assessing district-scale energy renovation alternatives.

€ View funding

Funding information

The authors would like to thank the European Commission for its support in the collaborative European research project drOp (https://drop-project.eu/), the drOp project partners for their scientific support and a special thanks to all Santa Ana’s residents and stakeholders involved in the process.

Bibliographic References

  • [1] Conci, M. & Schneider, J., A district approach to building renovation for the integral energy redevelopment of existing residential areas. Sustainability, 9(5), p. 747, 2017.
  • [2] Terés-Zubiaga, J. et al., Cost-effective building renovation at district level combining energy efficiency and renewables: Methodology assessment proposed in IEA EBC Annex 75 and a demonstration case study. Energy and Buildings, 224, 110280, 2020.
  • [3] Häkkinen, T., Ala-Juusela, M., Mäkeläinen, T. & Jung, N., Drivers and benefits for district-scale energy refurbishment. Cities, 94, pp. 80–95, 2019.
  • [4] Rose, J. et al., Building renovation at district level: Lessons learned from international case studies. Sustain. Cities Soc., 72, 103037, 2021.
  • [5] Evans, J.P., Sustainable regeneration. International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home, Elsevier, pp. 124–128, 2012. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ B9780080471631005312. Accessed on: 27 Jun. 2024.
  • [6] Liao, Z. & Liu, M., Critical barriers and countermeasures to urban regeneration from the stakeholder perspective: A literature review. Front. Sustain. Cities, 5, 1115648, 2023. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frsc.2023.1115648/full. Accessed on: 27 Jun. 2024.
  • [7] Natividade-Jesus, E., Almeida, A., Sousa, N., Coutinho-Rodrigues, J., A case study driven integrated methodology to support sustainable urban regeneration planning and management. Sustainability, 11(15), 4129, 2019. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/ 11/15/4129. Accessed on: 29 May 2024.
  • [8] Felce, D. & Perry, J., Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Res. Dev. Disabil., 16(1), pp. 51–74, 1995.
  • [9] Jacobs, J., Cities as ecosystems. https://jacobs.academicwebsite.com/projects/2-citiesas-ecosystems. Accessed on: 11 Jun. 2024.
  • [10] Manganelli, B., Tataranna, S. & Pontrandolfi, P., A model to support the decisionmaking in urban regeneration. Land Use Policy, 99, 104865, 2020.
  • [11] Wang, H., Zhao, Y., Gao, X. & Gao, B., Collaborative decision-making for urban regeneration: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Land Use Policy, 107, 105479, 2021.
  • [12] Ferretti, V. & Grosso, R., Designing successful urban regeneration strategies through a behavioral decision aiding approach. Cities, 95, 102386, 2019.
  • [13] Deakin, M., The case for socially inclusive visioning in the community-based approach to sustainable urban regeneration. Sustain. Cities Soc., 3, pp. 13–23, 2012.
  • [14] Natividade-Jesus, E., Almeida, A., Sousa, N. & Coutinho-Rodrigues, J., A case study driven integrated methodology to support sustainable urban regeneration planning and management. Sustainability, 11(15), 4129, 2019.
  • [15] Heath, S.C., Rabinovich, A. & Barreto, M., Exploring the social dynamics of urban regeneration: A qualitative analysis of community members’ experiences. Br. J. Soc. Psychol., 62(1), pp. 521–539, 2023.
  • [16] Woolrych, R. & Sixsmith, J., Placing well-being and participation within processes of urban regeneration. Int. J. Public Sect. Manag., 26, 2013.
  • [17] Wang, H., Zhao, Y., Gao, X. & Gao, B., Collaborative decision-making for urban regeneration: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Land Use Policy, 107, 105479, 2021.
  • [18] Jiang, C., Xiao, Y. & Cao, H., Co-creating for locality and sustainability: Designdriven community regeneration strategy in Shanghai’s old residential context. Sustainability, 12(7), 2997, 2020.
  • [19] Dean, R.J., Counter-governance: Citizen participation beyond collaboration. Polit. Gov., 6(1), pp. 180–188, 2018. https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsand governance/article/view/1221. Accessed on: 28 Jun. 2024.
  • [20] Saez Ujaque, D., Roca, E., de Balanzó Joue, R., Fuertes, P. & Garcia-Almirall, P., Resilience and urban regeneration policies: Lessons from community-led initiatives. The case study of CanFugarolas in Mataro (Barcelona). Sustainability, 13(22), 12855, 2021.
  • [21] Sgambati, S. & Gargiulo, C., The evolution of urban competitiveness studies over the past 30 years. A bibliometric analysis. Cities, 128, 103811, 2022.
  • [22] European Commission, Aggregation and improved governance for untapping residential energy efficiency potential in the Basque Country (H2020 GA 847068). https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/847068. Accessed on: 27 Jun. 2024.
  • [23] Urrutia-Azcona, K., Tatar, M. & Molina-Costa, P., Cities4ZERO: Overcoming carbon lock-in in municipalities through smart urban transformation processes, 2020.
  • [24] Nicolas, O. & Molina-Costa, P., Demand aggregation as a strategy for untapping buildings’ energy renovation potential: Diagnosis and prioritization methodology and case study from the Basque Country. Sustainability, 13(24), 13881, 2021. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13881. Accessed on: 29 May 2024.
  • [25] drOp, Putting the residents at the heart of social district regeneration. https://dropproject.eu/. Accessed on: 28 Jun. 2024.
  • [26] Marcos, J.R., Estructura y cambios del parque residencial de la c.a. de euskadi. 2001.